Trump Declares US In ‘Armed Conflict’ With South American Drug Cartels

President Donald Trump has designated drug cartels as unlawful combatants and stated that the United States is engaged in an “armed conflict” with them, according to an administration memo obtained Thursday by The Associated Press. The declaration follows recent U.S. military strikes against boats in the Caribbean.

The memo signals an expansive interpretation of presidential war powers, framing drug trafficking into the United States as an act of armed conflict that justifies military action — a shift that could provide new legal grounds for both past and future operations, the Associated Press reported.

“The President determined that the United States is in a non-international armed conflict with these designated terrorist organizations,” the memo says. Trump directed the War Department to “conduct operations against them pursuant to the law of armed conflict.”

“The United States has now reached a critical point where we must use force in self-defense and defense of others against the ongoing attacks by these designated terrorist organizations,” the memo says, per the AP.

Beyond marking a potential shift in Trump’s “America First” agenda, which emphasizes limiting foreign interventions, the declaration raises significant questions about the scope of presidential war powers, said the outlet.

It remains unclear how far the White House intends to extend its authority in targeting cartels — and whether Congress will move to assert its role in authorizing or restricting such military actions.

“The United States is taking a much more dramatic step — one that I think is a very, very far stretch of international law and a dangerous one,” Matthew Waxman, a national security official in the George W. Bush administration, told the AP.

“It “means the United States can target members of those cartels with lethal force. It means the United States can capture and detain them without trial,” he added.

The U.S. military conducted three strikes last month against boats in the Caribbean that officials said were transporting narcotics, with at least two of the vessels reportedly originating from Venezuela.

The actions came amid a major buildup of American maritime forces in the region, described by defense officials as the largest in recent memory. The Navy has maintained a presence of eight warships and more than 5,000 sailors and Marines in the Caribbean for several weeks, according to two officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the operations are ongoing, noted the AP.

While there was no timestamp on the memo, it nevertheless referenced a Sept. 15 strike by American forces that “resulted in the destruction of the vessel, the illicit narcotics, and the death of approximately 3 unlawful combatants.”

“As we have said many times, the President acted in line with the law of armed conflict to protect our country from those trying to bring deadly poison to our shores, and he is delivering on his promise to take on the cartels and eliminate these national security threats from murdering more Americans,” the White House said at the time, per the AP.

Pentagon officials briefed senators on the recent strikes during a classified session at the Capitol on Wednesday, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity. The White House directed follow-up questions back to the administration. Several senators interpreted the briefing as outlining a new legal framework for military action, raising concerns about Congress’s role in authorizing such operations, the person told the AP.

House staffers were given a separate briefing on the strikes last week, according to another individual familiar with that meeting, who also requested anonymity to discuss the matter, the AP noted.

“The memo, which was reported earlier by The New York Times, lays out a rationale seen both as the administration’s justification for the military strikes it has already taken on the boats in the Caribbean — which have raised concerns from lawmakers as potentially unlawful — as well as any action to come,” the outlet reported.

Related Posts

My Ex-Husband’s Mother Threw Me Out—Then I Sold Her House and Fired Her Son as CEO

Claire Ashford never expected that her nine-year marriage to Julian would end with humiliation and betrayal. After their divorce, her mother-in-law, Vivian, treated Claire as an outsider, unaware that Claire…

Read more

My Son Told Me To Leave By Friday Never Knowing Who Really Owned My House

Ruth Clarke, an eighty-one-year-old widow, was shocked when her son, Greg, told her to leave the family home by Friday and prepare to move into a nursing home. Greg and…

Read more

Doctors Found Something Unusual During My Medical Exam but a 12 Year Old Record About My Husband Left My Son Speechless

For twelve years, Margaret Whitmore kept a sealed envelope in her bedside drawer. Her husband, Robert, had given it to her three days before his death, asking her to open…

Read more

Can You Find the 4 Hidden Objects

Most people believe they are good at noticing details, but this picture proves how easily the brain can miss hidden objects. At first glance, it shows only a simple scene:…

Read more

Coffee Girl Puzzle: Spot the Difference!

Hey everyone, welcome back to another fun visual challenge! Today, we have a super interesting picture puzzle for you. Are you ready to test your eyes and see how sharp…

Read more

My Husband Was Gone, and Our Son Sold His Boat—Until a Stranger Revealed His Final Secret

Two weeks after her husband Mike died, a woman named Joanne discovered that their son, Tyler, had sold his father’s beloved fishing boat for just $600 without asking her permission….

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *