Should the national anthem be honored in at sporting events?

The anthem playing began at the end of WWI, and was seen as a show of patriotism and a unifying force. Playing the song at sporting events, specifically baseball games, was a way of having tens of thousands of people unite under the flag.

While it didn’t catch on completely, it fired back up during WWII. It was everywhere, even before movies and theater performances. Many teams simply stuck with it, but it was during Vietnam where it became basically a full fledged staple.

The US is pretty much the only country that plays the national anthem before domestic events. Some see it as a political game, almost like an indoctrination. Others see it as patriotism, respecting the flag and country. Others, still, see it as faux patriotism – that patriotism doesn’t come from banner waving and chest thumping. And still others see is as respect for those who fought in those battles, and or other civil servants who risk their lives every day to keep us safe

 

VA

Related Posts

“Get out of here, you wretch!” The mother-in-law kicked her out into the street with an old suitcase after the funeral, never imagining the secret her son had left hidden in her pocket…

One worn suitcase. One thin coat. One framed photo of the only person who had ever truly chosen her. “Get out of here, you wretch!” Margaret Monroe’s voice cut down…

Read more

Hours ago in Tel Aviv, Israel faced sudden missile strikes, causing panic and damage. Residents rushed to shelters as sirens blared across the city. The Israeli government declared a state of emergency, mobilizing forces and closing some civilian activities. Tensions rise, fear spreads, and the world watches closely, uncertain how the escalating conflict will unfold next

Israel Faces Escalating Crisis After Missile Strikes in Beit Shemesh Israel’s president has confirmed that the security situation is rapidly evolving following a new wave of reported missile strikes originating…

Read more

The Supreme Court has issued a landmark 8‑1 ruling, reshaping legal precedent on a major issue. Justices deliberated intensely, and the decision reflects a significant interpretation of the Constitution. Legal experts say it will have wide-ranging effects, influencing policy, future cases, and public debate. The lone dissenting justice emphasized caution, highlighting deep divisions even within the court

Supreme Court Rules for Trump Administration, Ending Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans A landmark Supreme Court decision has sent ripples through Washington and immigrant communities nationwide. In an 8–1 ruling,…

Read more

My 7-Year-Old Daughter and Her Father Began Having “Private Talks” in the Garage — So I Installed a Hidden Camera and Instantly Regretted It

Jason has always been the kind of father people quietly envy. He doesn’t just attend school events — he volunteers. He braids Lizzie’s hair with surprising patience. He sits cross-legged…

Read more

I Became a Surrogate for My Sister & Her Husband — When They Saw the Baby, They Yelled, ‘This Isn’t the Baby We Expected’

I learned the answer the day my sister looked at the baby I had carried for her and said, “THIS ISN’T THE BABY WE EXPECTED. WE DON’T WANT IT.” Rachel…

Read more

Donald Trump responds to Iranian threat after strikes kill Supreme Leader

Trump’s decision to greenlight the Tehran strike marked a point of no return. By targeting Ayatollah Khamenei and senior leadership, Washington and Jerusalem didn’t just hit a regime figurehead; they…

Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *